guided evolution (vs rule by decree or democratic centralism)

there haven’t been a lot of public activity on riza lately and we’ll discuss that in a later, perhaps more personal post, but now let me update you on one core insight that we’ve reached through this silent period. it’s really quite simple and perhaps could even be tied to dao or aikido principles, however let me not get carried away with metaphors too much.

whenever possible, guide the evolution into desired direction rather than swim against the stream or run up the downstream elevator. in this case, not only (as we mentioned somewhere on community) we prefer evolution to decide what is the best approach to fighting challenges, but also consider that we may better achieve our goals by gradually reshaping 0net into riza, without losing neither data nor all of the userbase. this will also provide time to test out solutions which do and don’t work and let riza be well tested from its official start.

with this in mind, we’re currently concentrating on resolving immediate 0net issues (such as reliance on centralized and controlled by potentially compromised creator of the network) while also preparing grounds for merging riza features into zeronet-conservancy.

– riza committee